
In 2009, James Cameron set the benchmark for 3D. In 2011, Martin Scorsese set the benchmark for live-action 3D. Hugo isn’t the result of a shoddy post-production 3D conversion (a la Clash of the Titans, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2). This was shot in 3D and is most certainly MEANT to be seen in 3D.
Don’t be fooled by the “family movie” label or the posters that give off a fantasy vibe. This is a Scorsese movie and thus is chock-full of Scorsese’s classic film techniques. He paints a very detailed picture of a 1931 Paris train station that is full of energy. He also includes a fine set of British actors and actresses to bring even more life to the scene. Saruman from Lord of the Rings/Count Dooku from Star Wars (heck, I have never seen Christopher Lee play anything other than an antagonist). Uncle Vernon, Madame Maxime, Narcissa Malfoy from Harry Potter. The film is very much dialogue and character-driven, and just like always, Scorsese takes his dear time to develop everything to the fullest. At two hours long, the film is a bit too long to be standard family fare, but by Scorsese standards, it is fairly shot. Then again, nothing Scorsese does is “standard fare.” Leave it up to him to make a movie about making movies. The 3D is by far the best I have ever seen in a live-action film. Everything pops out as they should; I have no idea how he did it. He has certainly set an example for future filmmakers.
Overall, Scorsese’s first venture into non-R territory is a beautiful success. Those who love movies for what movies are will be further drawn in by what the film has to offer.
Wednesday Dec 12 @ 11:06am
reblogged from jjwangstir
originally posted by jjwangstir
-
johnnydepth reblogged this from jjwangstir
-
shinyjules reblogged this from jjwangstir
-
amyyylam liked this
-
jjwangstir posted this
Source: jjwangstir